Life in general
Monday, July 26, 2010
You have to love the atheist approach to Christianity. Prove there is a God because we can't prove there isn't. It is squarely on the shoulders of the atheist because God came first. Even if you don't believe in the Bible, the story of God is still there and must be disproved. Historically this is impossible, scientifically it can't be replicated, and in such can't be disproved. As Christians we have faith in our God, and don't need to go to ridiculous extremes to try to defend out faith. Faith, the belief in things not seen, seems to trip them up everytime.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
I covered this on Facebook as well, but I'll copy/paste the comment here for good measure... as you seem intent on spreading your idiotic dishonesty here as though not only has this not all been explained to you a number of times already, but EVEN RIGHT HERE ON YOUR BLOG already.
And you feign ignorance by acting like we HAVEN'T been over this all numerous times now. *sigh*
I'll include it in the next comment.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_ignorance
"An argument from ignorance, also known as argumentum ad ignorantiam or appeal to ignorance, is an informal logical fallacy that asserts a proposition to be either true or false merely because it has not been proven or disproven."
And of course that coupled with http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_dilemma
"The logical fallacy of false dilemma (also called false dichotomy, the either-or fallacy) involves a situation in which only two alternatives are considered, when in fact there are other options. Closely related are failing to consider a range of options and the tendency to think in extremes, called black-and-white thinking. Strictly speaking, the prefix "di" in "dilemma" means "two". When a list of more than two choices is offered, but there are other choices not mentioned, then the fallacy is called the fallacy of false choice, or the fallacy of exhaustive hypotheses."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophic_burden_of_proof
"The philosophic burden of proof is the obligation on a party in an epistemic dispute to provide sufficient warrant for their position. In any such dispute, both parties will hold a burden of proof. However, their respective burdens of proof will often be unequal or asymmetrical. The burden of proof has been demonstrated to be a useful tool in public debate and scientific methodology.
When debating any issue, there is an implicit burden of proof on him or her making a claim. This burden does not demand a mathematical or strictly logical proof (although many strong arguments do rise to this level such as in logical syllogisms), but rather demands an amount of evidence that is established or accepted by convention or community standards.
This burden of proof is often asymmetrical and typically falls more heavily on the party that makes either an ontologically positive claim, or makes a claim more "extraordinary", that is farther removed from conventionally accepted facts."
These things have all been pointed out to you MULTIPLE TIMES already Don. Grow up and stop repeating known invalid arguments. It makes you a willful liar.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/lie
"a false statement made with deliberate intent to deceive; an intentional untruth; a falsehood."
Thanks.
(continued next comment)
(And if you read through his other blog posts and the earlier debates we had here on Jack's profile, you'll see just how in depth all these things have been covered with him, and how stubbornly and dishonestly he continues to repeat the same tired, and proven invalid fallacious bullshit.
Here's the bulk of it, in chronological order (I thnk) for your convenience.
See for yourself HOW MANY TIMES these things and much more have been presented to Don, explained in great detail, etc... only to have him continue dishonestly trying to slander atheists and nonbelievers with what he should know by now isn't remotely true or valid.
http://phreadom.blogspot.com/2010/06/your-par-for-course-debate-with.html
http://phreadom.blogspot.com/2010/06/idiocy-continues.html
http://dadderzvan.blogspot.com/2010/06/what-24-hours.html
http://dadderzvan.blogspot.com/2010/06/as-i-afor-mentioned-when-athiest-cant.html
http://dadderzvan.blogspot.com/2010/06/person-that-i-was-talking-about-in-my.html
http://dadderzvan.blogspot.com/2010/06/rewriting-history.html
http://dadderzvan.blogspot.com/2010/06/you-have-to-love-dogged-determination.html
http://dadderzvan.blogspot.com/2010/06/httpwww.html
http://dadderzvan.blogspot.com/2010/06/ill-share-something-on-lighter-side.html
http://dadderzvan.blogspot.com/2010/06/atheism-by-it-own-admission-has-said.html )
We're not trying to "covert Christians to Athiesm" you dipshit... as has been explained to you many times now. We're trying to get you to STOP FUCKING LYING and ADMIT WHEN YOU'RE WRONG because of the HARM YOUR LIES AND IDIOCY DO TO THE REST OF THE WORLD AND EVEN YOURSELVES.
It's the same stupidity on your part as your failure to understand that science isn't about being anti-religion. It's merely about establishing the facts based on actual real world empirical observation of the objective evidence. That it happens to disprove your ignorant ancient mythology is a completely unintended side effect of that process, and the very antithesis of your narrow minded claims of intentional persecution.
Amiable brief and this mail helped me alot in my college assignement. Thanks you as your information.
Post a Comment